Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology 2/2024

17.04.2024

Robotic Surgeries in Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Disease

verfasst von: Asmita Chopra, MD, Jiage Qian, MSPH, Adam Tcharni, BA, Alessandro Paniccia, MD

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of review

Pancreatic resection stands as one of the most challenging abdominal surgeries, primarily indicated for pancreatic malignancies such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), pre-malignant conditions like intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), and benign pathologies that manifest with significant symptoms, including intractable pain, often concomitant with endocrine or exocrine dysfunction. The inherent complexity and morbidity associated with pancreatic resection, exacerbated by the high risk of pancreatic anastomosis complications, including pancreatic leaks of amylase-rich fluid, is further amplified by the pancreas’s retroperitoneal location near vital anatomical structures. This underscores the imperative need for a thorough assessment of emerging surgical approaches, with particular attention to the application of robotic technology. This review appraises the impact of robotic-assisted surgery on the operative and oncological outcomes of patients afflicted with benign and malignant, pancreatic and peri-pancreatic, diseases.

Recent findings

Robotic surgery has exhibited a correlation with enhanced post-operative outcomes such as reduced morbidity and mortality following pancreatic resections. Furthermore, it has demonstrated a positive association with improved oncological resection and outcomes in patients diagnosed with pancreatic and peri-pancreatic cancer.

Summary

Minimally invasive surgery has substantially refined the landscape of pancreatic resections, offering diminished post-operative pain and reduced hospital stay. Robotic surgery, distinguished by its superior visualization and meticulous tissue handling capabilities, enables precise dissection and seamless anastomosis in the complex realm of pancreatic surgery. Consequently, this has translated into ameliorated morbidity and mortality in this patient cohort, emphasizing the critical role of surgeon proficiency and case volume.
Minimally invasive resection in the context of malignancy has demonstrated favorable oncological outcomes. This is potentially attributed to improved oncological resection (increased negative margins and lymph node yield) expedited post-operative recovery, facilitating prompt initiation of adjuvant therapy and attenuating surgical stress-induced tumorigenesis.
Nonetheless, future randomized controlled trials are indispensable to comprehensively elucidate the impact of robotic resection on the host immune response and long-term outcomes following pancreatic resections, encompassing both benign and malignant etiologies. Such investigations hold the promise of advancing our understanding and optimizing the role of robotic surgery in the context of pancreatic diseases.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat • Müller PC, Kuemmerli C, Cizmic A, et al. Learning curves in open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and proposal of a standardization. Ann Surg Open. 2022;3(1):e111 Published 2022 Jan 27. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000111. This systemic analysis describes the learning curves and phases associated with open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.CrossRef • Müller PC, Kuemmerli C, Cizmic A, et al. Learning curves in open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and proposal of a standardization. Ann Surg Open. 2022;3(1):e111 Published 2022 Jan 27. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​AS9.​0000000000000111​. This systemic analysis describes the learning curves and phases associated with open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat • AlMasri S, Kraftician J, Zureikat A, Paniccia A. Management of intra-operative hemorrhage and safe venous resection in robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: techniques to avoid open conversion. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27(8):1753–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05684-y. This paper presents methods for safe vascular resection and reconstruction in robotic pancreatic surgery and highlights the feasibility of this procedure.CrossRefPubMed • AlMasri S, Kraftician J, Zureikat A, Paniccia A. Management of intra-operative hemorrhage and safe venous resection in robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: techniques to avoid open conversion. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27(8):1753–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11605-023-05684-y. This paper presents methods for safe vascular resection and reconstruction in robotic pancreatic surgery and highlights the feasibility of this procedure.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590. These guidelines represent an international consensus on the use and outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic resections, including robotic techniques.CrossRefPubMed •• Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):1–14. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000003590​. These guidelines represent an international consensus on the use and outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic resections, including robotic techniques.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Song Y, Zou W, Gao Y, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. Surg Endosc. Published online December 18, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10635-4. Song Y, Zou W, Gao Y, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. Surg Endosc. Published online December 18, 2023. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-023-10635-4.
24.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, et al. 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg. 2021;273(5):966–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003550. This is the first large scale study of its kind to include the highest number of robotic pancreatoduodenectomies at a single institute, which established benchmarks for RPD.CrossRefPubMed •• Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, et al. 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg. 2021;273(5):966–72. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000003550​. This is the first large scale study of its kind to include the highest number of robotic pancreatoduodenectomies at a single institute, which established benchmarks for RPD.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat • Meyyappan T, Wilson GC, Zeh HJ, et al. Robotic approach mitigates the effect of major complications on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(2):1181–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09638-4. This study from a high-volume robotic pancreatectomy center reports superior oncological outcomes with robotic surgery when compared to the conventional open approach.CrossRefPubMed • Meyyappan T, Wilson GC, Zeh HJ, et al. Robotic approach mitigates the effect of major complications on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(2):1181–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-022-09638-4. This study from a high-volume robotic pancreatectomy center reports superior oncological outcomes with robotic surgery when compared to the conventional open approach.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Chun YS, Pawlik TM, Vauthey JN. 8th Edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: pancreas and hepatobiliary cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(4):845–7.CrossRefPubMed Chun YS, Pawlik TM, Vauthey JN. 8th Edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: pancreas and hepatobiliary cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(4):845–7.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Augustinus S, Mackay TM, Andersson B, et al. Ideal outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy: a transatlantic evaluation of a harmonized composite outcome measure. Ann Surg. 2023;278(5):740–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006037. This international retrospective analysis utilized a large heterogenous population to establish the “ideal outcome” following pancreatoduodenectomy and subsequently developed a tool to assess surgeon and institutional outcomes.CrossRefPubMed •• Augustinus S, Mackay TM, Andersson B, et al. Ideal outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy: a transatlantic evaluation of a harmonized composite outcome measure. Ann Surg. 2023;278(5):740–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000006037​. This international retrospective analysis utilized a large heterogenous population to establish the “ideal outcome” following pancreatoduodenectomy and subsequently developed a tool to assess surgeon and institutional outcomes.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirks RC, Lorimer PD, Fruscione M, et al. Robotic longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis: comparison of clinical outcomes and cost to the open approach. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1832 Kirks RC, Lorimer PD, Fruscione M, et al. Robotic longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis: comparison of clinical outcomes and cost to the open approach. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13(3). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​rcs.​1832
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic Surgeries in Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Disease
verfasst von
Asmita Chopra, MD
Jiage Qian, MSPH
Adam Tcharni, BA
Alessandro Paniccia, MD
Publikationsdatum
17.04.2024
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1092-8472
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-309X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-024-00449-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology 2/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.