Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by chronic, irreversible degradation of articular cartilage. Traumatic joint injury in young adults greatly increases the risk of developing OA [
1,
2] and post-traumatic OA remains a major clinical and societal problem. Treatments following joint trauma initially focus on reducing pain and swelling, and often by subsequent reconstructive surgery to stabilize joint biomechanics, for example, for injuries involving anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. However, these interventions do not prevent the progression to secondary OA after injury [
3,
4]. Following knee injury, high levels of aggrecan fragments and cross-linked peptides from type II collagen accumulate in the synovial fluid [
5]. Moreover, joint injury results in an immediate surge in synovial fluid concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6 and IL-8 [
6‐
8]. The levels of these cytokines remain elevated for weeks and eventually decrease to levels detected in chronic OA joints [
8]. Thus, cartilage in the injured joint is often subjected to an initial biomechanical insult [
9] and then further compromised by the presence of high levels of inflammatory cytokines [
10].
In a recent report, we highlighted the interplay between mechanical and cytokine-mediated pathways regulating cartilage degradation relevant to traumatic joint injury [
11]. We used an
in vitro model involving injurious compression of cartilage explants to simulate the initial mechanical insult, and subsequent co-culture with exogenous cytokines to simulate the inflammatory component. In both human and bovine cartilage, mechanical injury and TNFα synergistically increased proteoglycan degradation [
11]. Moreover, mechanical injury potentiated the combined catabolic effects of TNFα and IL-6 along with its soluble receptor, sIL-6R, causing the most severe glycosaminoglycan (GAG) loss among all treatment conditions. Proteoglycan degradation was found to be mediated by aggrecanase activity [
11] in these studies.
In the present study, we address the potential utility of glucocorticoids (GCs) in the treatment of joint injury. Intra-articular injection of GCs is an established treatment for both chronic OA and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [
12,
13]. GCs exert their effects by binding to intracellular glucocorticoid receptors (GRs), which act as transcription factors in cells. The activated GRs either directly or indirectly regulate the transcription of target genes. For example, GRs are known to enhance the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 receptor antagonist and IL-10 [
14], while the expression of molecules associated with inflammatory processes, including cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα, and cyclooxygenase-2 [
15‐
18] is repressed. The effects of GCs in cartilage are less well understood. Since human chondrocytes have been shown to express GRs [
19,
20], the potential effects of GCs in treating joint disorders may be due to direct regulation of chondrocytes, but this possibility has not been widely studied.
Dexamethasone (DEX) is a very potent synthetic GC due to its high receptor binding affinity [
21]. DEX has been commonly used in cartilage tissue engineering; numerous studies have demonstrated that DEX potentiates the ability of progenitor cells to undergo chondrogenic differentiation and to synthesize cartilage proteoglycans [
22‐
24]. However, the effects of DEX on cartilage matrix turnover, particularly those changes associated with joint injury, remain unclear.
The objectives of this study were: (1) to test the hypothesis that short-term treatment with DEX could abolish matrix degradation and the known reduction of chondrocyte biosynthesis caused by the combination of mechanical injury and inflammatory cytokines in bovine and human cartilage explants, (2) to investigate whether DEX regulates this metabolic response at the transcriptional level in chondrocytes, and (3) to explore mechanistic pathways by which DEX may suppress cartilage degradation. The pathways of interest included regulation of aggrecanase gene expression and the activation of aggrecanases by proprotein convertases, the effects of DEX on inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA and protein levels, and the role of glucocorticoid receptors.
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-4,-5 (ADAMTS-4 and -5) are the primary aggrecanases responsible for the pathological process of aggrecan degradation in human OA [
25]. Aggrecanases are synthesized as latent, inactive enzymes whose pro-domains must be removed by proprotein convertases (PCs) in order to express their catalytic function. Studies have shown increased activity of PCs in both osteoarthritic and cytokine-stimulated cartilage, and inhibiting PC activity significantly reduced cytokine-induced aggrecan degradation [
26]. Among the PCs, furin, PACE4 and PC5/6 are capable of removing the prodomain of ADAMTS-4 [
27], while furin and PC7 have been shown to process pro-ADAMTS-5 [
28]. Thus, regulation of aggrecanase activation as well as mRNA levels of ADAMTS-4 and -5 are both pathways of interest.
Materials and methods
After a description of cartilage explant harvest and the methods for applying injurious mechanical compression to these explants, we then delineated methods to test the effects DEX on matrix metabolism in explants subjected to mechanical injury and inflammatory cytokine challenge. In one series of experiments using bovine and human cartilage, DEX was added immediately at the time of injury and cytokine treatment. In another series of experiments using bovine tissue, DEX was added either two days before or two days after injury + cytokine treatment to test whether DEX could protect and/or rescue changes in cartilage matrix metabolism caused by injury. The concentration of DEX used in all these tests was determined from an initial dose-response study. We then describe methods for experiments focusing on mechanistic pathways, including studies of DEX regulation of chondrocyte transcription, effects of DEX on iNOS mRNA and protein levels, and inhibition of glucocorticoid receptors and proprotein convertases.
Bovine cartilage harvest and culture
Cartilage disks were harvested from the femoropatellar grooves of one- to two-week-old bovine calf knee joints (obtained from Research 87, Hopkinton, MA, USA) as previously described [
29]. A total of 16 joints from 13 different animals and 1 human were used. Briefly, cartilage-bone cylinders (9 mm diameter) were cored perpendicular to the surface. After a level surface was obtained by removing the most superficial layer (approximately 100 to 200 μm), one to two sequential 1 mm-slices of middle zone cartilage were cut from each cylinder. Five disks (3 mm-diameter, 1 mm-thick) were cored from each slice using a dermal punch. Cartilage from this middle zone in newborn calves was shown previously to have a reasonably homogeneous population of cells and matrix [
30]. Cartilage disks for all treatment groups were matched for depth and location along the joint surface [
31]. Disks were equilibrated in serum-free medium (low-glucose DMEM (Cellgro, Herndon, VA, USA)), 10 mM HEPES buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium (10 μg/ml, 5.5 μg/ml and 5 ng/ml, respectively), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 0.4 mM proline, 20 μg/mL ascorbic acid, 100 units/mL penicillin G, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/mL amphotericin B (all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA)) for two days prior to treatment in a 37°C, 5% CO
2 incubator.
Postmortem adult human donor tissue
Human donor knee cartilage (49-yr-old female, modified-Collins [
32] grade-1 knee joint) was obtained from the Gift of Hope Organ and Tissue Donor Network (Elmhurst, IL, USA), approved by the Office of Research Affairs at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center and the Committee on Use of Humans as Experimental Subjects at MIT. Any fibrillated areas detected under visual inspection were excluded from the study. Human cartilage harvest and culture were identical to that of bovine, but included the intact superficial zone and each disk was approximately 0.8 mm thick. Human knee cartilage was obtained from both the femoropatellar groove and femoral condyles.
Injurious compression
After equilibration in medium for three days, disks were injuriously compressed in a custom-designed incubator-housed apparatus [
33,
34]. Each bovine disk was subjected to radially unconfined compression to 50% final strain at 1 mm/second velocity (100% per second strain rate), followed by immediate release of load at the same rate, as described [
29]. Immediately after injury, some disks were deformed to an ellipsoidal shape (deformation score of 1 or 2 as described in [
35]), but none exhibited gross fissuring. Adult human cartilage disks were thinner, had intact superficial zone and different effective biomechanical behavior compared to the immature bovine disks, reflecting the anisotropy and inhomogeneity associated with the presence of the superficial zone. The combined properties were such that higher strain and strain rate values were needed to produce levels of peak stress and visible deformation in human cartilage similar to that observed for immature bovine tissue [
29]. Thus, a strain of 60% and strain rate of 300%/second were used, the same values utilized in our recent report with this
in vitro injury plus cytokine stimulation system for adult human cartilage [
11]. The resulting macroscopic tissue changes in human cartilage disks were similar (elliptical appearance) to those described previously using our human cartilage injury model and scoring system [
36]. After injury, samples were immediately placed in treatment medium.
DEX dose-response
In a DEX dose-response study, bovine cartilage samples (70 disks from two joints of one animal) were treated either with or without rhTNFα (25 ng/mL) and incubated for six days with increasing concentrations of DEX (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), from 0.1 nM to 100 μM.
Exogenous cytokines, injury and DEX treatments
Cartilage samples were either subjected to injurious compression or left uninjured, incubated with or without cytokines (all from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and with or without DEX. Previously [
11], we observed that treatments with TNFα, TNFα + injury, TNFα + IL-6/sIL-6R, and TNFα + injury + IL-6/sIL-6R caused significant release of GAGs from both human and bovine cartilage explants, with the latter condition causing the most severe loss of GAG. In this study, we first examined the effects of DEX on cartilage explants under these same conditions. For bovine cartilage (70 disks from two joints of another animal), DEX and recombinant human TNFα (rhTNFα) were used at 10 nM and 25 ng/mL, respectively, based on the results from the DEX dose response study. For human cartilage (36 disks from the distal femur), DEX and rhTNFα were used at 100 nM and 100 ng/mL, respectively. rhIL-6 (50 ng/mL) was always used in combination with soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R, 250 ng/mL), since this combination was found previously to induce greater aggrecan degradation than when used separately in the presence of TNFα [
37]. Bovine cartilage disks were cultured in these conditions for six days. Culture duration for human explants was extended to 10 days based on earlier studies showing that human cartilage released sGAG more slowly than bovine cartilage for these conditions [
11]. Medium was replaced every two days and saved for analysis.
Pre- and post-treatment with DEX
To test whether a short-duration pre-exposure of cartilage to DEX could prevent GAG loss and inhibition of biosynthesis induced by subsequent cytokine treatment, bovine cartilage disks (10 disks from a separate animal) were either pre-treated with DEX for two days or incubated in medium alone. Afterwards, both groups were incubated in medium containing TNFα but no DEX for an additional four days. To test whether post-treatment with DEX could diminish the effects of a pre-established cytokine insult, cartilage explants (10 disks from a different animal) were first treated with TNFα for two days, and DEX was then added to the medium in addition to continued treatment with TNFα for another four days. GAG loss and radiolabel incorporation were measured as above.
Matrix biosynthesis and biochemical analyses
Two days before termination of the bovine cultures, the medium of each disk was supplemented with 5 μCi/ml Na
235SO
4 (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) as a measure of the rate of proteoglycan synthesis. The amount of radiolabeled sulfate was doubled in studies of human cartilage. Upon termination, disks were washed, weighed and solubilized (proteinase K, Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and radiolabel incorporation was measured using a liquid scintillation counter [
30]. The amounts of GAG lost to the medium and retained in the cartilage were measured using the dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) assay, with shark chondroitin sulfate (Sigma) as the standard [
38].
Gene expression studies: RNA extraction and real-time PCR
To examine the effects of DEX, injury and TNFα on chondrocyte gene expression, bovine cartilage disks from six different animals were cultured for four days under the eight treatment conditions: (1) no-treatment control, (2) DEX-only, (3) mechanical injury only, (4) DEX + injury, (5) TNFα, (6) TNFα + DEX, (7) TNFα + injury, and (8) TNFα + injury + DEX. A total of 48 disks per animal from each of six different joints (six different animals) were used. From each joint, RNA was pooled from the six disks assigned to each of the eight treatment conditions (matching disks from along the joint surface across treatment groups). Thus, there were six different repeats of this experiment in total, with each repeat corresponding to a different joint (animal). Samples were pulverized in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). The extract was spun at 13,000 g for 10 minutes in Phase Gel tubes (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) with 10% chloroform (Sigma). After spinning, the clear supernatant was obtained and RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini columns (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA); genomic DNA was removed by a DNase digestion step (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Absorbance was read at 260 nm and 280 nm to measure the concentration of RNA and the purity of the extract. Reverse transcription of equal quantities of RNA (2.5 μg) from each condition was performed using the AmpliTaq-Gold Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) [
39]. Genes of interests were those involved in cartilage homeostasis, including matrix molecules (aggrecan, collagen II and IX), cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα), proteases and protease inhibitors (ADAMTS-4,-5, matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP-3)), iNOS and a housekeeping gene (18 S). Bovine primer sequences for all genes except iNOS, collagen IX and IL-6 were reported in our previous studies [
40,
41]; sequences for these latter three genes were reported in another study [
42]; they were also designed using Primer3 software [
43] on the basis of bovine sequences. A standard curve for amplification was generated for each of the primer. All primers demonstrated approximately equally efficiency, with standard curve slopes of approximately 1, indicating a doubling in complementary DNA quantity in each cycle [
39]. Real-time PCR was performed using Applied Biosystems ABI 7900HT instrument and SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Measured threshold values (Ct) were converted to RNA copy number according to primer efficiencies. Within each condition, the RNA copy numbers for each gene were normalized to that of 18 S from the same condition. To examine the effects of treatments, each gene was then normalized to its level in the no-treatment control group.
Pathways: inhibition of glucocorticoid receptor, proprotein convertases and iNOS
The role of chondrocyte GRs in the response to DEX was studied in bovine cartilage samples (30 disks from one animal) by treatment with the GR antagonist, RU486 (1 μM, Sigma), in the presence of TNFα and TNFα + DEX for six days. The role of proprotein convertases in matrix degradation was tested by the addition of the PC inhibitor decanoyl-RVKR-CMK (10 μM, Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA, USA) to bovine cartilage explants (35 disks from one animal) cultured with different combinations of TNFα, IL-6/sIL-6R and mechanical injury. The levels of iNOS protein were measured following four-day treatments of bovine cartilage disks with TNFα ± injury, in the presence or absence of DEX. The disks were then pulverized in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in buffer solution (20 mM pH 7.6 Tris, 120 Mm NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)). Equal amounts of protein were collected from each condition, run on 4 to 15% gels (Invitrogen) and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) for immunoblotting. Western blots were performed using anti-bovine iNOS antibody (1:1000, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), followed by secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:4000, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). In another study, nitrite levels in the medium of 48 disks (one animal) were analyzed using the Griess Reagents (Invitrogen).
Statistical analyses
In studying the effect of DEX dose on GAG loss and proteoglycan biosynthesis, a general linear model was used to analyze the data, followed by Dunnet's test for comparisons to controls. In evaluating the effect of DEX on GAG loss, sulfate incorporation and nitrite accumulation in cytokine-treated and mechanically-injured bovine and human cartilage, as well as the effect of CMK on GAG loss in bovine cartilage, a general linear model with Bonferroni's test was used to conduct hypothesis-based comparisons. For the study testing the effect of RU486, a general linear model was used followed with Tukey's test. In the studies of pre- and post-treatment of cartilage with DEX, a two-way general linear model with Tukey's test was used to evaluate differences between conditions and time points. For gene expression studies, log-transformed expression data were analyzed using a general linear model followed by Dunnet's test for comparison of each of the conditions to no-treatment controls. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM, with P ≤0.05 taken as statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SYSTAT-12 software (Richmond, CA, USA).
Discussion
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of DEX on cartilage proteoglycan degradation and synthesis in response to combined treatments with mechanical injury and pro-inflammatory cytokines. We previously reported that co-stimulation of cartilage with TNFα and IL-6/sIL-6R caused significantly more GAG release than either cytokine alone, in both immature bovine knee and adult human knee and ankle cartilage [
11]. Moreover, mechanical injury substantially potentiated the combined catabolic effects of TNFα and IL-6/sIL-6R by inducing severe matrix degradation. In this study, we first demonstrated that DEX, over a wide range of concentrations (1 nM to 100 μM), completely blocked TNFα-induced GAG loss and reversed the reduction in biosynthesis caused by TNFα in bovine cartilage (Figure
1). Even in the absence of cytokine stimulation, cartilage disks exposed to higher concentrations (that is, 0.1 to 100 μM) of DEX released fewer GAGs and showed increased sulfate incorporation compared to control samples.
Importantly, DEX (10 nM) also restored proteoglycan biosynthesis and inhibited GAG loss caused by the treatments with TNFα + IL-6/sIL-6R, injury + TNFα, and injury + TNFα + IL-6/sIL-6R (Figures
2 and
3). The proteoglycan fragments produced under these conditions were previously found to be generated by aggrecanases, not MMPs [
11]. Thus, the inhibitory effect of DEX on matrix degradation may involve modulating the proteolytic activities of aggrecanases. Recently, Malfait
et al. demonstrated that DEX blocked aggrecanase activity in an
in vivo model of cartilage degradation: intra-articular injection of TNFα in rats resulted in aggrecanase-generated proteoglycan degradation, which could be inhibited by either an aggrecanase inhibitor or DEX, but not a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug [
44].
Surprisingly, DEX did not abrogate GAG release via a substantial reduction in aggrecanase transcriptional levels. In particular, the mRNA levels of ADAMTS-4 and -5 in response to TNFα + injury treatment remained elevated in the presence of DEX (Figure
6). Similarly, DEX did not down-regulate the gene expression of iNOS, although it markedly reduced the level of iNOS protein as well as nitric oxide production in both cytokine-stimulated and cytokine plus injury-treated cartilage (Figure
7). Previous studies by Guerne
et al. [
45] and Shalom-Barak
et al. [
46] also reported the down-regulation of cytokine-induced nitric oxide synthesis in human chondrocytes by glucocorticoids. Therefore, DEX may not regulate matrix degradation at the transcriptional level alone. Aggrecanase activity can be affected at multiple levels, including altered protein expression, pro-enzyme activation and binding to aggrecan via the C-terminal thrombospondin motif. In this study, we hypothesized that DEX may block aggrecanase activity by inhibiting the activation of latent pro-ADAMTS-4 and -5. We showed that blocking PC activity significantly reduced GAG loss in the cytokine plus injury treatments (Figure
8), consistent with the important role of PCs in proteoglycan degradation. Others have made similar observations with TNFα-treated cartilage [
26]. Ongoing studies focus on how DEX modulates PC activities as well as other possible mechanisms involved in DEX-induced inhibition of proteoglycan degradation.
We further demonstrated that treating cartilage with DEX either before or after TNFα stimulation significantly reduced GAG loss and increased proteoglycan biosynthesis (Figure
4). These observations suggest that the effects of DEX are long lasting and may provide protection against further exposure to cytokines. Even when catabolic processes have already begun in cartilage, DEX treatment could still suppress GAG loss and increase biosynthesis.
In this study, we also observed that DEX (100 nM) significantly reduced GAG loss in human cartilage (though no stimulation of proteoglycan biosynthesis was seen). Hardy et al. also observed that DEX blocked IL-1 stimulated proteoglycan degradation in OA cartilage cultured with synovium [
47]. Guerne
et al. reported that DEX inhibited the down-regulating effect of IL-1 and IL-6/sIL-6R on proteoglycan synthesis, enhancing matrix synthesis in normal, and, to a lesser extent in osteoarthritic human chondrocytes [
45]. Together these reports indicate DEX may also produce favorable responses in human cartilage.
GCs have been widely used in the treatment of joint diseases [
12,
13]. Most studies and trials reported beneficial responses, including significantly greater reduction of pain and tenderness, and increased motion in the injected joint [
48,
49]. However, because the mechanism of GCs in cartilage function is not well understood, and since there have been anecdotal reports of GC-related side effects when treating joint diseases, the chronic use of GCs in OA treatment remains controversial. It has been noted that the reports describing negative effects of GCs often involved either frequent injections or high dosages [
50]. More careful reviews have shown that the efficacy of GC is dependent on the concentration used [
51]. In order to avoid complications, longer intervals between GCs injections for the weight-bearing joints have been recommended [
52]. Future intra-articular treatments may also involve the use of micro and nano drug delivery technologies, which could enable local, controlled release of GC and avoid the problems associated with frequent injections and over dosage [
53]. There have not been any reports on the long-term effects of GC treatment on joint injury. However, the current study suggests the concept that immediate treatment of DEX in the injured knee may greatly retard the initial progression of cartilage degradation. Moreover, our data suggest that even delayed administration of DEX may also be beneficial, thereby providing the clinician with a window of therapeutic opportunity.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
YCL conducted all the experiments, analyzed the data, conceived of and designed the studies, confirmed data analysis and wrote the manuscript. CE and AJG conceived of and designed the studies, confirmed data analysis and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approve the final manuscript.